Development of Methods and Designs for the Assessment of the Fish Assemblages of Non-Wadeable Rivers in New England

Development of Methods and Designs for the Assessment of the Fish Assemblages of Non-Wadeable Rivers in New England
MBI/2015-3-3

The New England Large Rivers fish assemblage assessment was supported by a Regional Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (REMAP) grant from U.S. EPA in 2008-15.  Field sampling took place in 2008-9, and data management, analysis, and synthesis occurred in 2010-15.  The analyses were supplemented with methods and data from related projects conducted on the non-wadeable rivers of Maine during 2002-9 and the Connecticut River in 2008-9.  The sampling methods applied in the 2008-9 New England Large Rivers (NELR) REMAP project were originally developed and refined during the Maine Rivers project.  A probabilistic site draw from the 2008-9 National Rivers and Streams Assessment (NRSA) provided the initial basis for making comparisons of the fish assemblage condition assessment and sampling methods between the Maine Rivers and NRSA methods at co-occurring sites.  The purpose of the NELR REMAP project was to address biological assessment method and sampling design questions.  The project focused on flowing waters that are not effectively sampled by wading methods and which are therefore considered to be "non-wadeable".  Adding operational clarification and consistency to this term was an important underlying project objective.

The principal goals of the project included:

  1. Describe a standardized protocol for sampling riverine fish assemblages and habitat in the non-wadeable rivers of New England for Clean Water Act (CWA) assessment and other water resource management support purposes;
  2. Generate estimates of fish assemblage condition and stressor effects in non-wadeable rivers throughout New England;
  3. Compare assessment outcomes produced by different spatial sampling designs across New England and in selected mainstem rivers;
  4. Determine the transitional characteristics between wadeable and non-wadeable sites in New England;
  5. Compare the outputs of two different fish sampling methodologies;
  6. Describe a process for biocriteria development including the development of reference condition, multimetric indices, and a template for tiered aquatic life uses in the non-wadeable rivers of New England using the Biological Condition Gradient (BCG; Davies and Jackson 2006) as a conceptual foundation.

Authors

Chris Yoder , Lon Hersha , Edward T. Rankin

Related Reports

Assessment of the Biological Assemblage Condition of Small Headwater Streams in Ohio

Assessment of the Biological Assemblage Condition of Small Headwater Streams in Ohio

Small headwater streams in Ohio have emerged specifically the importance of assessing headwater streams that are typically in the range of 1-20 square miles.

MBI/2011-6-6
Read Full Report
Biological and Water Quality Study of the Little Miami River and Tributaries 2012: Hamilton County, Ohio

Biological and Water Quality Study of the Little Miami River and Tributaries 2012: Hamilton County, Ohio

The 2012 bioassessment of the Little Miami River and tributaries is the second of four years of sampling and analysis that is being conducted following the design...

MBI/2013-6-8
Read Full Report
Development of a Biological Condition Gradient for the Upper Mississippi River and 'Synthetic' Historical Fish Community

Development of a Biological Condition Gradient for the Upper Mississippi River and 'Synthetic' Historical Fish Community

The "'Biological Condition Gradient'" (BCG) was originally developed by U.S. EPA to overcome difficulties in effectively communicating about ecological...

MBI/2011-5-1
Read Full Report
View More Reports